http://www.dzhope.com/index.php zh-cn http://www.dzhope.com/post// jed <jed521@163.com> Tue, 11 May 2010 00:46:47 +0000 http://www.dzhope.com/post//
Enter nginx.  Nginx is another web server similar in nature to lighttpd.  We thought we’d give it a go with just one of our clients which processes in the vicinity of 800 connections per second.  Here is our commentary:
1) nginx seems very well designed and coded – I find the configuration absolutely brilliant and very self explanatory to a developer.  I think a non-developer might have a bit of a hard time with it however, but I’m I’m sure they could work it out.  One of the biggest hates in all the forums is how badly nginx is documented – it’s NOT true.  I found the core features to be very well documented (in English) albeit in various locations.

2) Speed – The improvement was immediately noticable.  This webserver software is indeed faster than lighttpd.  Anybody wishing to argue – go home.  It’s faster under both small loads and large loads.

3) High-volume of connections – Handles it smoothly.  Lighttpd really had problems here.  Nginx doesn’t seem to care.

We did get one error which didnt seem documented anywhere so we ended up going through the source code to track down the issue.  The error message we were getting was:

“upstream sent too big header while reading response header from upstream”

Which would cause 502 Bad Gateway errors.  Apparantly this is an expected error with the default fastcgi configuration as the buffer size is not big enough for processing our headers (not sure why considering I think the default is 4k?).  Anyway – here is our fastcgi paramaters that appear to be currently working:

fastcgi_connect_timeout 60;
fastcgi_send_timeout 180;
fastcgi_read_timeout 180;
fastcgi_buffer_size 128k;
fastcgi_buffers 4 256k;
fastcgi_busy_buffers_size 256k;
fastcgi_temp_file_write_size 256k;
fastcgi_intercept_errors on

Overall, we’re going to let nginx run for a few weeks and see if we run into any more little problems.  If we don’t, we’ll look into changing our entire CDN over to nginx as lighttpd just isn’t cutting it performance wise, and the bug support seems almost non existent these days.  Personally, I think lighttpd’s days are numbered and I’m expecting its distribution to start reducing sometime over the next 6 months….


Tags - nginx , 502 ]]> http://www.dzhope.com/post//#blogcomment <user@domain.com> Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.dzhope.com/post//#blogcomment